'Discipline & Punish (Foucault, 1975) is not just a history of the Essay

objurgate & Punish (Foucault, 1975) is not just a history of the emergence of the prison nevertheless a history of the emergence of a - Essay ExampleThus, Discipline and Punish could be deemed as Foucaults critique not just now on the effectiveness of prison in attaining its key objectivethe disciplining of the prisoner by subjecting him to conditions that are marked by extreme surveillance and controlbut also on the true reason for the emergence of various social structures today such as the government, school, and other institutions (Mc Gaha, 2000). Precisely, it is Foucaults belief that such systems had tho been created to cater the elite group (which I shall explore in more detail in the next part of the paper) that bolstered his onslaught on the basic foundations of humane civilization. Specifically, by recognizing the means of prison and other social institutions as merely instruments used by the elite to principal(prenominal)tain and enhance their power in society, Fou cault was satisfactory to question essentially the possibility of attaining human freedom in modern-day society. In a deeper regard, I could surmise that Foucaults attacks on social structures could be attributed to his anarchistic mindset (though not explicitly revealed in any of the texts) as he clearly disregarded the need for such systems. Therefore, human freedom must(prenominal) be seen as the act of letting one be and not following what and how one must be. His precise bastardization of naturals or ideals (as allow for be discussed later on) could clearly provide an ideological nexus between his anarchistic mindset and his post-modern orientation. If seen in this context, Foucaults take on the human essence (for the lack of a better term) is slightly existentialist. In this paper, I like to delve further into Foucaults Discipline and Punish by dividing the discussion into quaternion parts. The first part shall emphasize on the short history of the penal system, which coul d be traced back to 17th century. Through this part, I aim to highlight on the fact that the development of the penal system had shifted the punishment from physical to mental. The second part will be dedicated to reinforcing the concepts of power and control as the main thrust for the creation of modern social institutions. This will infuse the significant role of the elite in the formation of such institutions. The third part shall postcode in on Foucaults conceptualization of human freedom as hardly attainable given the flaws in modern day systems today. By having this part, I am to provide a reasoning that encapsulates Foucaults socio-political ideologies Evolution of Punishment and the Rise of the Penal System Following the flow of discussion in Discipline and Punish, Foucault opted to start (in a more detailed light) with a detailed discussion on public tortures and executions that transpired during the17th and 18th centuries. Presenting explicitly the execution of the Damien s, Foucault (1976) narrated, after these tearings with the pincers, Damiens, who cried out profusely, though without swearing, raised his head and looked at himself the same